Arguements with Oneself
When you are trying to be honest with yourself in an academic environment you are often obligated to take stands contrary to those you would like to hold to make sure that you are coming to the right conclusion overall. It's a conflict between beliefs and thoughts
I do believe that the Internet is a medium that can advance democracy and that unlike older media it's relatively low costs of access and production give it certain advantages over other media capable of having mass reach. The problem is that while that is my belief, I'm also aware that there are other factors acting on us. I find the paper that we are reading very "Americacentric", and that given that we are not the only democracy it helps to look further afield to other experiences. I'm particulalry taken by
Popper's concept of the
Open Society, which is less about particular media and more about how we approach the place of people and communication (especially unpopular communication) in the body politic. Or as Pericles said:
"Although only a few may originate a policy, we are all able to judge it."
This is democracy, and it happened over a millenium ago.
On another level though, Sherry Turkle has noted in last week's Chronicle that computers shift the communication from content values to presentation values. Got to think about that one.